Ed Beat

Subscribe subscribe what's this

Is Mike Miles The New Face Of Education Reform?

by Learning Matters on May 25th, 2012

You may remember this December 8, 2008 TIME Magazine cover that helped cement Michelle Rhee as the face of education reform in America. At Learning Matters, we covered Michelle Rhee’s tenure as superintendent for three years; there’s no doubt that her celebrity became a big part of the story.

Rhee runs StudentsFirst now, where she continues to affect school reform in the U.S.

Now, the new face of education reform among superintendents might be Mike Miles.

At the EWA Conference in Philadelphia last week, we received a copy of outgoing College Board president Gaston Kaperton’s new book, The Achievable Dream, which introduced me to Miles in greater detail.

Miles came to prominence as the superintendent of Harrison School District Two in Colorado Springs, CO; there, he closely linked teacher pay to teacher performance and instituted a policy where teachers had to instruct with their doors open, increasing transparency. He was hired to lead Dallas ISD on April 26, 2012; Dallas is the 14th-largest school district in America presently (second-largest in Texas).


How sweeping will Mike Miles' reforms in Dallas ultimately be?

While Miles’ plans for DISD aren’t known yet — his job officially begins on July 1, but he’s been quoting Moneyball at press conferences to explain some of his changes — it seems that some of the focuses will be feedback (including more assistant superintendent school site visits), Spanish-language programs, and a healthy dose of Teach for America teachers (Charles Glover, a TFA leader in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, was Miles’ first hire as Chief Talent Officer).

This 2010 profile of Miles, written when Rhee was still heading D.C. schools, makes the comparison between the two leaders directly:

Miles has been compared with Michelle Rhee, the go-get-em chancellor who has been villainized and lauded as she tries to repair the shattered Washington, D.C. school system. Rhee, a Korean-American who once taught in the innovative Teach for America program but has never been an administrator, was tapped to run the troubled district of 46,000 students. She has rewarded good teachers but has fired more than 250. Obama has called her “a wonderful new superintendent,” but she gained the wrath of the Washington Teachers Union, which is appealing the firings.

The question many are asking not only of Rhee, but of Miles: Are they reformers who can measure the quality of teachers in a fair way and bring reform to public education, or are they outsiders moving so recklessly that they’re endangering the good in public education along with the bad?

William McKenzie, blogging for The Dallas Observer, added this:

DISD has a new superintendent who seems more firmly rooted in the education reform camp than former Superintendent Michael Hinojosa was during his tenure. Dr. Hinojosa was certainly not opposed to reforms like more realistic teacher evaluations, developing stronger principals, using data to drive instruction and giving students choices through charters. He put his weight behind each of those. But neither was he as driven by education reforms that people like new superintendent Mike Miles seem to be. Hopefully, Miles won’t be as combative as uber-reformer Michelle Rhee was in D.C., but he seems much more in her student-focused approach to education.

So, dear readers … what do you think? Is Miles the new face of education reform in America? Is it fair to link Rhee and Miles? What can we expect from Dallas schools over the next decade?

categories: Ed Beat


Does “advanced” have to mean “better”?

by Elena on Dec 21st, 2009

10WolfsonHigh022108On the New York Times’s “Room for Debate” blog, a daily topic is offered up to a panel of experts for commentary, and yesterday they were talking about the “Advanced Placement Juggernaut.” A.P. classes have been offered to high school students for fifty years now, but in the past five their enrollment has increased by 50 percent. The program is nearly universally accepted as a good thing, and it’s particularly well-liked by college admissions officers. But some researchers and educators call its value into question.

Trevor Packer, who represents the College Board in the Times’s discussion, argues that the only problem with Advanced Placement is how few minority and underserved students have access to AP classes. He says:

…studies have indicated that teachers’ preconceived notions of student potential are often at odds with student capability. We should applaud teachers willing to take on students whom others had pre-judged as lacking in potential, not just those interested in teaching students who are likely to earn a 5 on an A.P. test.

Of course, as teacher Patrick Welsh notes, the College Board has a vested interest–in the way of $86 per A.P. exam administered–in the steady increase of A.P.’s popularity across all demographics. And researcher Kristin Klopfenstein points out that many students hoping to get into selective colleges enroll in A.P. classes without taking the final exam. Because many high schools weight the grades of students enrolled in A.P. classes, students know that A.P.s will not only look good on their transcripts, they’ll also boost their class ranks.

We recently covered the success of BASIS charter schools in Arizona, where they credit much of their success to a heavy focus on A.P. coursework. Are college-level classes the key to successful learning in high school? Let us know what you think.

The Advanced Placement Juggernaut [NYT, 12/20/09]

1 comment  

A Decade of Learning, Sleuthing and Reporting at Learning Matters

by Elena on Dec 18th, 2009

Yesterday, Scholastic published a list of the “10 Biggest Education Ideas of the Decade.” The list covers charter schools, technology and the stimulus, among other topics. For the past decade–and since long before that–the producers at Learning Matters have done in-depth reporting on big ideas in education; at the same time, they’ve told the intimate stories of the people behind those ideas. To mark the end of the aughts, I asked our producers which stories, series and documentaries they feel most proud of, or found most interesting to work on. Watch, read and listen to the results below.


1. Paul Vallas in New Orleans: Episode 6 - Mixed Results for School Reform Efforts

Valerie Visconti**
Valerie Visconti
, Associate Producer: My favorite series is the one I have been producing for over two years on the New Orleans school system under the leadership of Paul Vallas.

I first met Vallas in Episode 1, at a rally where he pumped up his teachers for the start of his first school year as Superintendent. I was taken aback by his enthusiasm to take over one of the worst school districts in the country. Vallas was a whirlwind: eager, ready, armed with high expectations, and no one was going to stand in his way. His gusto surely rubbed off on his teachers, as they danced in the aisles to classic New Orleans trumpets and cheered at every catchphrase Vallas rattled off, in the incessant way he has of speaking. There was an excitement in that convention center room that was unmistakable; you had to be there to believe it.

Three years in, one thing is clear: Vallas has not lost one bit of zeal for his mission. His hyperactive nature has led him to roll out an abundance of new initiatives, many of which got off to a shaky start. A teacher once told me, ‘Vallas has about 500 ideas…but if we are lucky we can get maybe 5 of them to work.’

One of my favorite episodes is Part 6, which aired at the end of his first year. This segment highlights Vallas’ greatest challenge: overage students struggling to move on. In the episode we follow two students: one drops out of an alternative school and the other finally graduates from a traditional high school after an astounding number of attempts to pass her graduation exam. The segment made the reality of New Orleans schools all too real to me; half of these students will never make it across the stage. However, seeing a student who makes it against all odds exemplifies the very thing Vallas is trying to prove: it is possible.

2. Turnaround Specialist: The Program

David Wald**
David Wald
, Managing Producer: One of my favorite projects is “The Turnaround Specialist,” which was a series we shot over the course of a year and aired in installments on the NewsHour. We did not know how Principal Parker Land, with years of experience in suburban schools, would perform at his first inner city school in Richmond, VA. So as we filmed him over the course of a year, everything was unexpected.

It was also kind of a confusing story because in the end scores went down at his troubled middle school and yet his superintendent “promoted” him to principal of a much bigger high school, requiring him to leave the middle school at least a year earlier than he’d planned.


3. Michelle Rhee in Washington, DC: Episode 6 - Tough Changes and Controversy

Cat McGrath**
Cat McGrath
, Producer: “What do you think of Michelle Rhee?”

Since joining Learning Matters in 2007 my focus has been on reform efforts in Washington D.C. under the leadership of Michelle Rhee. My first day on the job was the first day of school under Rhee’s watch and now, two years and eleven reports later, people continue to ask me what I think of her. Well, if you drop me an email me I might share some of my personal observations, but the reports pretty much say it all.

If you haven’t watched any of the episodes yet, I would start with Episode 6, which is a round-up of her first year in office. You’ll see a meeting Jane and I filmed in which the Chancellor fires a principal, and an end-of-the-year afternoon cruise I took down the Potomac with the staff of a school Rhee had decided to close. It has been quite a journey, and though it’s not over yet, I feel very fortunate to have met so many people in D.C. who are so passionate about education.

One of my favorite moments was when we ran in to a man who told us he had moved to D.C and taken a job as a Vice Principal after listening to one of our podcasts! He was also offered a job in Boston, but said the podcast inspired him to work in D.C. If you have a story about how our work has changed your mind about anything, one way or the other, I’d love to hear it!

4. Pay for Grades: The Program

John Tulenko**
John Tulenko
, Senior Producer and Correspondent: “Pay for Grades” is one of my favorites. At the time we produced it, the idea of paying students was considered avant-garde in New York City and elsewhere, but we found a tiny steel town in Ohio that had been doing it for years.




5. Podcast: After He’s Gone

Jane Renaud

Jane Renaud
, Producer: A favorite piece I worked on is the podcast “After He’s Gone,” which accompanied the NewsHour piece “Lessons of War.”

The podcast is a favorite of mine for two reasons. One, the listener really gets to take the time to get to know Scarlette Keeling, a 27-year-old mother of three whose husband, Corey, just deployed for Afghanistan. Scarlette and Corey were featured in our NewsHour segment, but as is often the case, we’re forced leave much of our interviews on the cutting room floor. Here, Scarlette and John Merrow’s conversation can unfold naturally, getting to that big question: “What do you say when they ask the big question: ‘Will Daddy die?’” Secondly, we interspersed sound recorded in the Keeling home and in their public school with the interview, giving an intimate, portrait feeling. This is one of the first podcasts I worked on, and it’s still my favorite.


6. School Sleuth: The Documentary

John Merrow

John Merrow, Executive Producer and Host: My favorite of the decade has to be School Sleuth, primarily because of all the elaborate production and storytelling that went into it. I choose it because it was (and is) so different from everything else we’ve done. John Tulenko, Tania Brief, Alexis Kessler, our professional actress, Eliza Foss, and I had a blast. We shot the set pieces during the wee hours of the morning at an abandoned spice factory in Brooklyn and then wove serious elements into the story of “The Case of an Excellent School.” I had just completed Choosing Excellence, my book on the same subject, and we did our best to have the two appear at the same time. Winning a George Foster Peabody Award, our first, was just icing on the cake.

By the way, the great recession has prevented us from bringing back the Sleuth in a second case, “Who’s Killing School Reform?”

7.  When School is Home: The Program

taniaportrait1Tania McKeown, Producer:  One report we produced last year that really left its mark on me was the story of homeless families and how schools were responding to this growing problem. We visited Green Bay, Wisconsin where dedicated teachers and social workers were identifying and assisting struggling families. Their work was inspiring and vital to the kids’ ability to succeed in the classroom. For me, the story highlighted that schools are (and should be) much more than a place of education…

categories: Ed Beat


Around-the-web Wednesdays: The race to the top, or the race to nowhere?

by Elena on Dec 16th, 2009

duncan_blogSecretary of Education Arne Duncan made two significant appearances this week: one on PBS NewsHour -which has recently updated its format to include more internet-based features, like this conversation between Duncan and correspondent Hari Sreenivasan about the Department’s financial literacy initiative and, of course, Race to the Top- the other a town hall meeting on “elevating the teaching profession” Duncan held with teachers from the D.C. area. The webcast is long, but full of honest and thoughtful comments from teachers on the need for better certification programs, the need for scholarships and grants related to ESL students, and more.

The L.A. Times published an op-ed piece this week by Ben Miller, director of a Los Angeles non-profit that works to empower parents in the reform of public schools. Without participation from parents, Miller argues, how does California expect to attract Race to the Top dollars–which the financially unstable state desperately needs? In an even more incensed op-ed, Diane Ravitch, writes in her blog on the Ed Week website that New York’s efforts to prepare for Race to the Top–which she calls “the express train to privatization”–have come at public school students’ expense.

Finally, in higher education news, the Washington Post has a good piece on the civil rights investigation around gender distribution in American colleges. Women apply to and attend colleges and universities in greater numbers than do men; do admissions offices have the right to discriminate based on sex, if they want to keep things 50-50?

Secretary Duncan: Finish Line Nears for ‘Race to the Top’ [PBS NewsHour, The Rundown News Blog, 12/15/09]

Elevating the Teaching Profession: A National Town Hall Meeting with Arne Duncan [Ed.gov, Education News Parents Can Use, 12/15/09]

Put power over California’s schools in hands of parents [LA Times, 12/16/09]

The Race to Nowhere [Bridging Differences, Ed Week, 12/15/09]

Sex bias probe in colleges’ selections [Washington Post, 12/14/09]

categories: Arne Duncan, Ed Beat, wednesday


Media Monday: Secretary Duncan may not like Michelle Rhee, but the Wall Street Journal sure does

by Elena on Dec 14th, 2009

The Wall Street Journal published an op-ed today that marries two of education’s hottest topics: D.C. superintendent Michelle Rhee and the Department of Education’s Race to the Top fund. The Journal claims that Secretary Duncan should more actively and publicly put himself in Rhee’s corner, since her reform efforts in D.C. parallel many of the Department’s alleged reform goals. Race to the Top funding will be given to states that prioritize pay for performance, charter schools, and tying teacher evaluation to student performance–all of which figure prominently in Rhee’s plan for D.C.

As you know if you’ve been following our coverage of Rhee, it’s the D.C. teachers’ union who most vehemently oppose her approach to school reform; it’s been more than two years since we started following Rhee, and her prolonged contract negotiations with the union are still unresolved. In many states, especially those with strong unions, it may prove difficult to get teachers on board with proposals for reform. The Journal writes:

The problem with this passivity is that union-negotiated collective-bargaining agreements are often the biggest barrier to enacting these education reforms. By not using their bully pulpit to back state and local reformers like Michelle Rhee, Mr. Duncan and President Obama are sending mixed messages, emboldening the opposition and jeopardizing their own education objectives.

The Journal’s unilaterally positive read on Rhee, whose reign in D.C. has been controversial, seems full of jumped-to conclusions. But it will be interesting to see whether the Race to the Top will produce replicates of the situation in D.C., as states and districts come up against union resistance, and whether Duncan’s position–”We generally don’t weigh in on local labor disputes”–will change.

To catch up on the ongoing negotiations between Rhee and the D.C. teachers’ union, watch our most recent coverage for the NewsHour, below, and listen to our interviews with Rhee and union president George Parker, collected here.

Who’s Got Michelle Rhee’s Back? [The Wall Street Journal, 12/14/09]

Two Years of Talks with Michelle Rhee & George Parker [LMtv, 9/21/09]

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Youtube
Join Our Mailing List